/lit/ - Literature

>>14424948
> literally as if the people and stories actually were real and there is historical/ archeological proof of them or figuratively?

>>13175211
>>13175239

The Gospels are deliberately not analogous. Each one addresses a different audience or personality, a lot of tremendous ideas about Subject-Object porosity, the Humors and Elements, the Logos as Phenomenon, etc.

>>13086028

Forgot the picture when I said meditate on Trialism. Just the schema, don't mind the text, or...do.

>>12849125

The premise is WHOLLY moronic and a textbook example of Anglo troglodytism. Confounding Solipsism with Subjective Idealism is one thing, but confounding the Empirical with the Ideal, claiming the former is not only an Epistemological locus as such, but that it is contrary to the latter as per the usual terrible Anglo arguments about Idealism in general; it's TRULY awful.