/lit/ - Literature

Oh God. Not another music thread on /lit/

>>10899753
Ebin

>entire western canon at your finger tips
>at least one person on this board will read this
>he'll tell himself he's doing it ironically

>>10489990
>starting university at 24
>studies English

>>9959250
>God, I hate how much I love her sometimes

I'm out

>>9840504
What is this dude even going for

>>9817918
> So while I was barely acquainted with David Wallace the man, his reputation was another matter.
>These two things aren’t the same, not in the case of any writer: a notion that many people would agree with in principle but that everyone has a hard time bearing in mind on a daily basis. Even the reputation of a reputation is subject to distortion. That Wallace was not widely regarded as a “great” writer during his lifetime is quickly being forgotten. Of course, a writer’s reputation changes over the years—that’s to be expected. Literary works grow or shrink in significance as the moment in which they were created recedes and as new readers bring new sensibilities to bear on them. But our memory of a reputation’s evolution itself changes, or at least that’s what seems to be happening in the case of Wallace.

What the fuck am I reading

>>9773903
>psychology is a science

>>9671154
>Pseud claims everyone who doesn't like his Pseud meme poet is a pseud

>>9662565
>There's a reason though for a law like that. It has to do with science and enlightenment

>>9628920
>>9628948
>Psychology is science

> I'm reposting from /pol/, just because I expect the quality of discussion here to be better.