/lit/ - Literature

>*hits pipe*
>Hey man, what if I wrote 300 pages of bad shit happening to some old cuck

I was underwhelmed by the book's content desu, but the cover is iconic and I wish I could another book for the feel depicted on it.

ITT: books that expose the female condition

Now that the dust has settled, was Stoner prejudiced against the disabled?

I can understand if he was. I once threw away a perfectly good apple simply because the clerk who handled and bagged it was retarded

>>8640303
I didn't understand why /lit/ like it until the very end. It was really good though, and it did live up to its hype.

"All during the service I kept thinking about Dave Masters. About Dave dying in France, and about old Sloane sitting there at his desk, dead two days; like they were the same kinds of dying" (89).

How are they the same kinds of dying?

Also, Stoner general.

was he autistic?

what did you expect?

>>7343258
>tfw i have to go into a small description of the book to distant it form the meme

I'm 1/4 through and it's good but I don't see yet why it's so raved about.