/lit/ - Literature

>>7399232

>>6983141
Holy shit, he knows Blue STEEL!?

Among a certain crowd, this man is denigrated to the fullest extent a man can be denigrated. He is almost held as an idol of the dangers of "scientism".

Trouble is, I often hear people guffawing when they hear him described as a "philosopher" or a "thinker", but I have not seen these people give a concrete explanation as to why what he says is so ignorant.

I'd like to hear from someone who has actually read his work to dismantle his points. Whether it be an academic paper on the follies of Sam Harris or just a brief explanation of how his ideas in regards to morality or free will or any other subject are ignorant or not intelligent, I would like to see them, because usually all the opposition has to offer are smug declarations of "Hmmph, he hasn't the slighest clue!"