/lit/ - Literature

Didn’t this guy just come up with post-hoc rationalisations for his pre-existing belief in God? Has anyone actually converted to theism from his arguments? Also, many Catholic apologists will say that sin is prevented atheists from belief, and that if you consider Thomistic arguments from a neutral standpoint, you will rationally conclude there is a God. But an argument for God isn’t like the proof for 1+1=2, it will always rely on a deeper need to believe/disbelieve. Long story short there can’t be a truly ‘rational’ proof for God.

PS, most professional philosophers don’t recognise Thomistic arguments for God.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jLFT_AH7h0