/lit/ - Literature

shark rape, mothers eating their babies, CAN YOU GUESS THE SUBJECT?

It seems to me that a lot of the western intellectual deficiency toward the natural way of things has been confounded and conflated with God, when really it is Nature, and so made to seem utterly false because of "all things" being declared to come from God rather than Nature. This introduces, I think, a good origin for the futile kind of resistance towards embracing the natural faculties of the body; things like sex and violence, which are immensely enjoyable. A Man and a Woman however seem to have trouble admitting that rape is natural and normal, or that the first time having sex with a person is itself always a simulation of rape in one way or another; the Man takes charge, the Womans screams are indistinguishable from pleasure or pain, for instance. A Womans deeply cannibalistic attitude toward her young, even.

I'm curious whether anybody has explored this subject of ... I suppose ... "natural" "materialism" and arrived at a worldview as violent and rapacious as the Jews in the Old Testament but without ever needing to cite a God to somehow justify or apologize for having fun doing rape and plunder.

It seems to me that without this understanding of nature or our nature we can never really be at peace with anything as a sense of guilt is attached to everything that is enjoyable. Is this just religions hook in the child consciousness which doesn't understand that mummys screams are intense pleasure and that daddy is not abusing her? Seems like if this is never conveyed to a child then a child is a basketcase nd various /pols/ emerge from that warped worldview.

Discuss.

>>20699002
re: claim in image
Having sex with slaves is not 'cheating on your husband/wife'.

>Can a woman be a stoic?
Sure, but it's probably harder as female culture in most times and places is far more drawn towards petty status amongst other women and shiny baubles.

>>20699973
I think, generally, the types of men and women who fall into (the above) are the same; the male bimbo and the female bimbo, both as a product of delayed adult cognitive development and both, in any natural setting, easily outwitted, easily overpowered, collared and thrown onto the boat.

The best traits shared by both begin with the desire to learn better, the worst traits shared by both begin with the social status focus; e.g. physical training to look good instead of physical training to incapacitate progressively more and more men in a combat scenario.

(i'm up to six in about 60 seconds)

>>20699998
>What about schizo /pol/neetcel women that could give a fuck less about status?
They don't exist. The 'alt right' woman (presume that's what you mean) has just figured out that she could make a slave of a man more easily if the mans head was filled with crackpot 19th century notions about how miserable toil for a lazy wife was 'desirable' and 'respectable'. I've spoken with plenty of these women are they're sly (bad character; no virtue, disinterested in learning and work) on a different level.