/lit/ - Literature

>>10343776
No one here claimed atheism has no arguments.

Let's remember how this started: You complained about how no Christians ever answer your arguments. I wasted my time offering to answer them. You named the "evidential problem of evil", I mistook it for the "logical problem of evil", you laughed at how retarded I looked, and now we're having this discussion that is just you jerking yourself off about how smart you are and how dumb Christians are.

Let's put it this way: I know some atheist arguments, but not all, and you know some Christian arguments, but certainly not all, and if you actually wanted to discuss you'd probably actually develop your arguments instead of pointing one and then jerking off to people not instantly recognizing it. And when I questioned why atheist philosophers exist, I was not doubting their interest on the subject. As I said, Pondé is a great philosopher, and also an atheist who thoroughly studied Scholastic, and he claims that trying to destroy Christianity is foolish and would just bring doom upon western society, so he avoids doing that. I don't see how anyone could think otherwise, unless it's just some blind chase for what they think is the "truth", which is funny coming from secularists but I can understand that