/lit/ - Literature

ATHEISTS VAUNT THEMSELVES AS «FREE», AS «SCIENTIFIC» —WHAT FREEDOM CAN HAVE THOSE WHO RENEGE OF GOD? WHAT SCIENCE CAN HAVE THOSE WHO ARE NESCIENT?

>>18162118


1. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A: «WESTERN CHURCH»; THE CHURCH IS UNIVERSAL.

2. THE CHURCH: UNSTABLE? IT HAS PERSISTED FOR TWO MILLENNIA.

3. «PROTESTANTISM» IS NOT A CHURCH; IT IS A HERETICAL, ANTICHRISTIAN SECT.

4. ORIENTAL SCHISMATICISM: STABLE? IT IS AN AGGREGATE OF QUASIANARCHICAL HEADS LANGUISHING IN THEIR FACTIOUS HUBRIS: A SOPORIFIC HYDRA.

MI FAVORITA ES SANTA CATALINA ALEJANDRINA.

>>16983304
>1/x For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

HOW IS THIS APPLICABLE TO CATHOLICS, ACCORDING TO YOU?


>5But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
>6And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
>7And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.


THESE ARE DESCRIPTIVE OF «PROTESTANTS», NOT OF CATHOLICS.


>8But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
>10Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.

THESE VERSICLES REGARD THE CULT OF PERSONALITY, WHICH IS A FORM OF IDOLATRY; JESUSCHRIST IS NOT CONDEMNING REVERENCE, BUT, RATHER, VENERATION.


>9And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.

THE SAME LOGIC AS IN VERSICLES EIGHT, AND TEN, IS APPLICABLE TO THIS ONE; IN PARTICULAR, IN THIS VERSICLE, JESUSCHRIST IS CONDEMNING PATERFAMILIALISM.


>11But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
>12And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.

THESE VERSICLES REGARD SVPERBIA/HUBRIS, NOT MAJESTY, NOR EXCELLENCE; JESUSCHRIST IS REMARKING ON THE RESPONSIBILITY, AND DUTY, INHERENT TO THE POSSESSION OF POWER, WHILST CONDEMNING FATUOUS ARROGANCE; HE IS NOT CONDEMNING POWER ITSELF, NOR GREATNESS.


>13But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

CATHOLICISM CHRISTIANIZED HALF THE WORLD —HOW IS THIS VERSICLE DESCRIPTIVE OF CATHOLICS, ACCORDING TO YOU?

(CHRISTIAN) BELIEF, AND SCIENCE; FAITH, AND REASON, ARE MUTUALLY COMPLEMENTARY, NOT MUTUALLY ANTITHETICAL, BUT THOSE WHO LACK EITHER OF THESE —OR BOTH— WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND THIS COMPLEMENTATION.

ATHEISTS VAUNT THEMSELVES AS «FREE», AS «SCIENTIFIC» —WHAT FREEDOM CAN HAVE THOSE WHO RENEGE OF GOD? WHAT SCIENCE CAN HAVE THOSE WHO ARE NESCIENT?

SAN CATALINA’LEJANDRINA

TU MUY AUDAZ Y PRUDENTE SABIDURÍA

PROPÍCIANOS, PARA QUE ASÍ

SEA’OBRA LA FATAL RUEDA ROMPER CON GRACIA

DEL SANTÍSIMO ESPÍRITU,

Y A EL TIRANO CÓSMICO DECAPITAR

CON LA’ESPADA DEL VERO VERBO.


ATEN.

ATHEISTS VAUNT THEMSELVES AS «FREE», AS «SCIENTIFIC» —WHAT FREEDOM CAN HAVE THOSE WHO RENEGE OF GOD? WHAT SCIENCE CAN HAVE THOSE WHO ARE NESCIENT?

>>12983052

1. YOUR COMPREHENSION OF WHAT, AND WHO,ARE GOD, THE DEMIOURGOS, AND SATAN, IS DEFICIENT, THEREFORE, YOUR QUESTION IS INHERENTLY FLAWED, AND ANY DIRECT ANSWER WOULD BE ABERRANT.

2. THE TETRAGRAMMATON IS SATAN —QVOD VIDE: «Y · H · W · H», AS YOU YOURSELF HAVE NOTED, BUT FAILED TO COMPREHEND.

3. SATAN IS ONLY A DEMON, AND IT IS VIRTUALLY CERTAIN THAT HUMANS, OR RATHER, THE IDONEOUS HUMAN, CAN KILL HIM.

4. THE DEMIOURGOS IS AN ABORTIVE REPLICA OF AN AION, EMANATED FROM SOFIA'S NOSTALGIA, THEREFORE, WHETHER THE DEMIOURGOS CAN BE KILLED BY HUMANS, OR A HUMAN, CONSTITUTES A MORE DIFFICULT PROBLEM TO RESOLVE.

5. I INFER THAT THE DEMIOURGOS CAN BE KILLED BY THE IDONEOUS HUMAN, BUT NOT THROUGH PHYSICAL MEANS, BUT, RATHER, THROUGH METAPHYSICAL MEANS, WITH SPIRITUAL WEAPONS, BUT I IGNORE PRECISELY HOW.