[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13481094 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1280x843, cass2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13481094

>>13481083
Mostly true, but my case is that men form social circles in which they judge each other on what they can do. If you start a youtube channel now talking about whatever semi-academic subject, people will judge you on the content and you'll not have subscribers because you're hot. Women are trained to make the most out of how they look like and get hooked into a validation cycle based on something that will deteriorate. The charming 55yo actor goes on to marry a 19yo, because he can. It's harsh. After 30, a bossy man is considered to have authority and his act together and a bossy woman is considered an tyrannic mother.

>> No.12730120 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1280x843, cass2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12730120

I'm a fairly sexy, fairly wealthy, fairly dominant mid 30's math PhD working in AI with a an obsession to do sometime important in life. I've also worked in quantum computation, blockchain and virtual reality (yes, my life is the tech meme). But I'm central European, not a silicon valley guy.
I got a good sex live, but maybe I make a baby with 36.
PS I also never read novels, just textbooks and philosophy. I see myself gravitating towards unconditional acc, not that I think that this perspective implies particular actions to take. It's more a style than anything else.

>> No.12649004 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1280x843, cass2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12649004

>>12648923
>Why arr trans people disproportionately mtf? Also why are pre-transition transwomen disproportionately autistc, loser, incel, anime-watching nerd-types?
I've tried to take a stance in this post >>12648419:
>I think it's mostly guys who don't function as men and also see that pretty girls have privilege / being admired / are desired, and they want something of that cake.

Women are inherently valuable.
Take a village of 100 men and 100 women where a disease spreads out and kills 95 people. If all of those 95 people are women, then in the next year you can have at most 5 newborns. If, on the other hand, all of those 95 are men, then you can still have 100 newborns next year! Uterus needs 9 month, a man cumming needs 5 minutes. With 100 women, you can make 100 babies. With 1 man, you can make thousands of babies. Women and kids leave the ship first, because women are the reproductive bottleneck.
Coming back, women are desired and they need nothing but fertility to be valuable. Men generally need to be better than other men.
So it's appealing for failures (>disproportionately autistc, loser, incel, anime-watching nerd-types) to become women.
For men it can be a last attempt of climbing up. For women, it's mostly because they are really tomboys on the inside.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]