/lit/ - Literature

>setting throws up a technological advancement that would call modern society's norms and standards into question, or permanently solve some pressing problem we face today
>old scifi: "wow that's really cool let's play it out to its logical conclusion"
>nu-sõyfi: "UM ACKSHULLY here's why that's actually problematic and The Current Thing is superior"
I hate this trend so much. Can we light these retards on fire as witches since they want to play medieval stasis with real life?

We as non faggot, non shitskin, non libtarded men, have it so hard in todays world. It is simply impossible to get published or be an author, as a consequence of the jewish zionist communist leftist lizardman LGBTBBQTVIA++£€¥&@!?? lobby. At this point, I am thinking about just giving up entirely. It’s over.

>decide to read a Polish sci-fi novel
>chapter 2, not more than 10 minutes of in, the character puts on a track suit

>by A. DUMAS

>My body says yes, but my mind says no

>>21384934
>trannies exist because people work jobs for wages

>>20584628
>the errors of Jung (who got psychoanalysis all wrong, as Freud, who taught him, told us)

>>19451337

>expect that anon is referencing some ancient casts or frescos depicting sexual intercourse in a way that refutes the tweet in the OP, referred to as the "woodman castings"
>google "woodman castings"
>it's porn of some bald french boomer fucking cheap sluts in the ass and dp'ing them with his skinny twink friend

>>19164212
>what are some good warhammer books
there aren't any, this is the "literature" board, not the "manchild genre-fiction" board

>mom is being the being of being again

>american author

>>15438453
How do offtopic posters find themselves incapable of stopping retardation and reading books to post about literature? This is at best a /his/ thread, take it there faggot, but they'll call you a retard for posting shitty bait too.
Everyone must sage

>a book for a podcast run by tankie numales
>new york times bestseller

>deterritorialization

>start with the greeks
>read plato
>it's all basic common sense shit
>read aristotle
>it's all nonsensical, unfounded shit

Gee thanks /lit/

>we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself
>which is why any evidence that opposes this conclusion must be illegitimate
>as you can see, all the legitimate evidence now supports our conclusion
>therefore we know that all people are equal because we've applied the scientific method to the question objectively and allowed the evidence to speak for itself

>book
>has words

>/lit/ards keep shilling that kid's memepoem when William Blake wrote objectively the best poem about tigers in the canon

>>11541536
>chick lit
Hair salon gossip put into written form.

>blank page
>handwritten note in pen: "this page unintentionally left blank, sorry about that!"

>subtle peterson shill

>be newfag
>make shit thread

>>10625315
Gender theory is just so fucking bullshit