/lit/ - Literature

Theodicy is pathetic in general but affirmation of Aesthetics is really scraping the bottom of the barrel. Even if Phenomena were interesting in any way, their affirmation as proof of God's greatness is the affirmation of the generic tyrant's architectural achievements as proof of his greatness. Even Atheists would struggle to top such mockery. Can Christians paint a portrait so repulsive that Yaldabaoth himself recoils?

There is so much Literature about this and almost all of it is based on the absurd assumption that the fullness of Mind is knowable through the misery of Phenomena.

No stasis of Mind hinges on any parts of personae or any emergent aspects thereof. To think otherwise is to play with ghosts.

>>9676217
>the father
>the father
>the father

>tfw archons

>(79) A woman from the crowd said to him, "Blessed are the womb which bore you and the breasts which nourished you."
He said to her, "Blessed are those who have heard the word of the father and have truly kept it. For there will be days when you will say, 'Blessed are the womb which has not conceived and the breasts which have not given milk.'' - Gospel of Thomas

Since the Material World, the Self, and the Object offer nothing at best, believing they are all there is will inevitably lead one to believe that everything is nothing.

>is being imprisoned in rotting matter and dumped in an endless desert where nothing but abjection of your internal state exists just a meme?

>he values phenomena more than noumena

Are there any books that claim embodiment is abject?