/lit/ - Literature

>what makes WMAF so fucking nice ? Is it the love ?

>Why yes Labatut is one of my favorite writers how could you tell?

>>21732672
>Wow, as if it didn't have enough ESL garbage, now it has ISLs (Italian). Real pseud stuff. Design is fire tho

>i see possibilities. you see only obstacles and impediments, and direct the gunk of your ressentiment -- this feeble anger -- at me, a board brother. i sincerely hope you can channel your pain into something greater one day. jah bless

> I like them. I think they're funny

>Kind of midwittish. The sentences turn well but he's saying very little. And caste means color already, I guess people didn't know that in oldern times.

>>21632257
>She’s a babe

>>21617465
>great book

>>21604755
>I am physically repulsed by the sight and smell of dirty physical laborers and want to ground my hatred in solid rational argumentation

>>21603990
>You are as boring as the people you try to make fun of

>asian women are pure kino

>>21600277
>I choose not to, and instead spend my money on actual material things like good food and drinks

>Will AI change literature forever?

>99% of books are not worth reading, I'm fond of reading history books and most of them are just wikipedia articles that were enlarged by a commentary of an author for the purpose of selling you an useless book for $20 because muh they used a lot of paper. I have started to read wikipedia only at this point when it comes to historical events, I have everything on one page along with sources, some of the articles are very long and exhaust the subject.
>
>Replace "history" with another subject, let it be fiction, copy of another book with different characters. Poetry? The same thing, Greeks wrote down everything 2,000 years ago. The only books that I read are philosophical, why? Because some negroes cite random people that just copied Plato for yet another time and disguised it by a mountain of synonyms and acronyms also I have autism. Most of them were proto-incels with some major cucks thrown in like our omega man Nietzsche, some were "human" to some extent.
>
>You only need to read 1,000 authors or so and you would read everything humanity ever produced (that is worthy), start from antiquity and you will already have 90% of valuable artists on your list.
No one ever wrote that down, because people don't fucking care and so do I. The rule is simple, produced after 1900? Into the trash it goes.
>
>Here is your redpill or rather blackpill, you read hundreds of useless words for the sake of reading, meanwhile there is a man in a cave training on ways to hunt you down. It's over.

>then did law, worked out pretty good

>this is a literary forum, you could attempt to be more original with your phrasing

> In two months, AI will be able to generate 60k-word books instantly. It is fucking over.

>>21513528
>realized that AI may actually surpasse human achievements in the field of literature

> Houlebeq is like Bukowski without any testosterone left.

>who?