/lit/ - Literature

>>22991575
superiority of 4chin over reddit comes from anonymousity. No fucking nigger who disagrees with me will go through my profile and check my comments from 5 years ago. Which means that I'm discussing topics with more of an idea of you, than an actual you. We could have quarreled in another thread, or had deep connection with in another, doesn't matter. Once the new thread starts we can talk freely to each other with no prejudices, which makes our weird relation more real than on any other website

>>22380731
>>22380735
>>22380741
>>22380984
>>22381037
>>22381185
>>22381771
>>22381822
Thanks for all the replies, I appreciate it

>>22244891
What are your evening plans?
I'm going to get mildly drunk and read the bible and maybe watch a couple episodes of futurama.

The tiger
He destroyed his cage
Yes
YES
The tiger is out

>>20909211
I'm learning how to make money and I'm 26. An Arab won't tell me what to do.

>>20833333
checking those quints by based Vargas Llosa enjoyer

>>19465350
>>19465355
EU be like
>if you oppose taking rapefugees you are racist
>but Belarus is attacking us by sending rapefugees
>but Poland is bad for violently protecting against rapefugees
>but Poland is good for protecting against Belarus rapefugees-attack
>but we need to take in and help the rapefugees
>but we need to punish Belarus for attacking/blessing us with rapefugees
>lets turn off Russian gas and freeze to death

Ive said it before and Ill say it again
>Belarus based for dabbing on neighboring NATO-puppets supporting Soros-tier colour revolution
>Poland based for putting armed troops on their border and defending against rapefugees
>Rapefugees based for invading Europe, further radicalizing Europeans and destabilizing EU

Because he's Based, and so are you OP, fuck Jannies.

>>18768794
There is no sensorial justification for the use of logic. Logic is a faculty of mind, not the senses. Do your eyes process logical propositions? Do your ears? Does your smell make atomic propositions as arguments? Sorry materialist empiricist cuck, you have no justification for logic in your worldview, nor do you have justification for the self or telos, meaning therefore have no reason to debate and there not even a person making your posts. You live in a blur of unconnected sensorial impressions

could you recommend good historians to me?

>>17242453
>Ukranian child modeling scene from the 2000's
Cheers, my friend

>>17007022
>/r/askphilosophy

Anon-omatopeia

Remember the night of the great golden frog
His vision foretold within quints that made quads
A glorious thread weaving multiple dubs
In Chains upon chains midst the tears and the hugs

The night's blessed 7s portended the zog
That all it's designs would yea come to naught
The night we were raided by demons and bots
In the form of the onions and the fag and the thot

For all of these night's we shan't yet forget
For we've archived the data and captured the gets
We've amassed us a priesthood of warriors and plebs
And summoned a God from the deepest of depths


Anon-omatopeia that speaks for itself
The chortle of laughter in moments unbest
The powerful trembled, the innocent wept
For the glorious stature of almighty KEK!

>>14752605
>>14752610
Considering this - If you have never spoken about a concept then you are unlikely to know it exists, much less understand it. Black vernacular is very obviously a simpler form of English that cannot convey complex concepts. To do that they need to use proper English.
Urban vernacular is verbal booty dancing, nothing more.
It is a dumber form of language. This does not mean that one who uses it necessarily is dumb.
But, anon, it's a much, much dumber form of language.

>>14277940
>even Moon Man and his random uncle who works at Auto Zone participated

based

/lit/, let us arrive at a consensus. A general POV. What are things all of /lit/ could agree on, philosophically and/or aesthetically?

or, another interpretation: if /lit/ was turned into a person; a human, then what views on life and death, what view on love and hate, and what views on evil and good would such a person have? What would be this persons tastes? Their passions? Their goals? Their weaknesses?

I am not asking what is literary, I am asking instead: what is /lit/'s interpretation of what is /lit/; of what this forum actually is and holds dear to, and what it reviles in the next breath?

Remember, mods, one thread is allowed per board to discuss that board to improve it's quality, and what is more useful to understand what a board is, what it has become, so it can subsequently evolve past itself?

>>13110673
Well anons that puts an end to that.

>>12870962
>Asserting that it would be a bad thing for Nietzsche off any of his works ignores him saying he gets constantly misinterpreted and people replace their own preferences for any of his through some psychic delusion.
Except Nietzsche has a full work titled the will to power which outlines the driving force in man - the will to power. I think it is safe to say the ubermensch will not have any of his thought based off slave morality.

>>12639134
A funny woman? Don't see that every day. Based.

>>12230449
thanks anon, just what I needed

>>12204766
Oh, I know that, I was just trying to find a base pure randomness that I could argue wasn't.
>>12204559
We must be using different definitions of freedom. I assume you are more aligned with >>12204715 definition of it.
>>12204600
Everything that I said was arguing for causality idiot.

>>12192290
>I haven't read Schopenhauer
>the only reading I do is on /lit/
>I fall for memes consistently
>my conception of major philosophers are based solely on their easiest texts, to the exclusion of their major works and ideas if they are phrased in anything but the simplest prose
damn it feels good to be a pleb

>>12153270
based and poetpilled