/lit/ - Literature

>>20600703
My hypothesis is that people don't or CAN'T read. They skim for key words, meme words that trigger a positive or negative response and reply accordingly with no regard to the meaning or lack of meaning of OP's writing as a whole.
Look at how obnoxiously stupid this OP is >>20600092, yet >>20600798 can't help but respond: key word [schizo] + response ["based"] -> output: Robert Anton Wilson book.
Another example: >>20566059
Look at the replies! Are these really people?