/lit/ - Literature

>Also, if the history of western philosophy has shown one thing, it's that debating in a vacuum about the existence of God is the most fruitless and sterile endeavor there is. Two conflicting systems can be logically sound.
>That is correct, although there have been interesting debates like the one between Copleston and Russell, which the former won because of the intellectual dishonesty of the latter. Or Heidegger's ontotheology challenge in which he ended up admitting that Aquinas had already solved it centuries before he even formulated it. Very interesting, really.
Where does Heidegger talk about this and allegedly "admit" that Aquinas solved this problem? I thought he pointed out that ontotheology isn't the answer because grounding Being in one particular kind of being (God being that being) sidesteps the question of Being.