/lit/ - Literature

You know what, OP? This is the first sensible thing I've heard all night. Think I'll shut down the computer and head on out to the library.

Also, I don't recommend any books that I haven't read. That's just being dishonest, and if there is anything old Applejack doesn't like, it's a liar.

Philosophical Fragments - Kierkegaard

It turned my conception of Christianity on its head, and reconciled me to the God I had hated for so long.

>>1912643

Indeed, there are points even where science breaks down, most notably at the highest levels of theoretical physics. Theoretical physicists have created models of how the universe might function. I won't pretend I understand these models, but from what I can gather, these models have an internal logic all their own, but we lack the technology to test which (if any) hypothesis is correct. In other words, at the highest levels of physics, the scientific method breaks down, and theoretical physicists can only make non-empirically observable conjectures about the nature of the universe. Because they cannot use the scientific method to test their theories, properly speaking, these physicists aren't technically scientists. You know what they are?
Philosophers!.

So really, you don't have a leg to stand on. My whole point is that the universe is very complex, and claiming that there is only one form of logic which science is best suited to arbiter is really quite absurd.

Oh yeah, and ponys.

>>1840344
Ask and you shall receive.
[Ohhhoohhhhoohhhohhhhh!]