/lit/ - Literature

STOOOOOOOOP !

>>11497611
You know, the one thing that really destroys and contradicts the whole core belief of the book is antisemitism.

The author upholds that "might is right" but then he goes on to shit talk the Jews because they have obtained power in society trhough "cowardly" means. Power is power, yet this whiny little faggot gets all uppity when someone (the Jews) manages to obtain power through means other than brute force and explicit violence.

In the natural world, the ability to deceive other creatures is just as important (if not more important) than brute force. The survival of the fittest cannot be reduced to a simply matter of military might; there are also other, more versatile, forms of power. The supremacy of the Jews over other races exemplifies that might is indeed right, but it is another kind of "might", a more refined kind, and the dumb Anglo-Saxon who wrote this book shouts: "It's not fair! You should play by MY rules! Only the sword will decide the victor!"

This dumb Anglo is just mad because the Jews are smarter than him and they can win without having to actually fight. In conclusion, Redbear is right, might is indeed right, but his definition of "might" is disingenuous and tailored to fit the virtues of Germanic barbarian tribes, disreagrding the suprior virtues of Chosen People.

P.S.: Note that I'm neither a Jew nor a philosemite. As a gentile, the Jews are my potential enemies (and potential allies as well, depending on circumstances), but I am not intellectually dishonest enough to deny that they're good at what they do.