/lit/ - Literature

>>14670042
i'm not a solipsist, there's the other person who gives me (you)s

>>9875719
To become 'great' in measure of ideological success the best measure is certainly associated with their ideas impact on the course of history
How much the course of history had on the development of that persons ideas is immeasurable itself - but we have to ask ourselves, who meets the criteria of global impact (greatness) and recency (latest)

One could look at contemporary pop philosophers like Zizek or Peterson but their impact is limited and we can expect it to stay so
We could also look at the classic authors this board discusses like Nietzsche and Marx, and they're certainly 'great philosophers' with global impact but are they really the latest?

Look at the world today - what ideological perspectives are most prevalent and also originating from at least the 20th century? I think the answer is clear

it's facebook meme page admins

>>9841618
is this microsoft live?
you need to be 18 to post here

Where's the V thread?

name one (1) good christian philosopher