/lit/ - Literature

So much of the battle of the sexes bullshit is peddled by neurotic middle class prudes who think they understand everybody else's sexuality better than they know their own. They have the same desires and urges as any other woman, but working class girls are a lot more honest about their sexualities. Why the discrepancy?

I am having a really hard time settling for a path of philosophy. I really know that what I want to explore isn't a limitation to a way but what philosophy actually is.
Yet I do not find it in me to see the many paths as those of many errors.
I can't go on studying a little Kant, a little ancient greek philosophy, Platonic Gödelian, Ethical being via Fichte, Dialectic wayfarer through Hegel, a philosophy of sciencelet from Hume through Popper to Kuhn, a philosophical logician, an aesthetic Schillerian, psychologist in Husserl, a communist social deconstructist Frankfurt School, early Wittgenstein coper Vienna school, a Nietzschean Übermensch, etc.

I feel like a coper who "choses" what religion he wants to stick with for the rest of his life when I consider focuses and narrowing down my efforts on one path.

I have read plenty of works that had great gravitas on me, but nothing eliminated other fields of philosophy or approach to the philosophy absolutely.

>>15866259
>he started w the greeks

i wanna read about the cultural revolution. what are the best books on it?
ideally looking for a mostly unbiased account, neither rabid-maoist or rabid-antimaoist.