/lit/ - Literature

>>15040965
>You are arguing that there are fundamentally flawed people, yet you say they are worth protecting.
These flaws were induced and they can be fixed. Of course they are worth protecting and you don't get to choose your belonging, you're stuck with them. It's like your mother and your father, would you not struggle for them even if they had flaws? And deep down do you not have a special love for them? Or would you say that if the choice was between their survival and prosperity and some foreign savage who wouldn't think twice before murdering you and raping the women in your family, would you not side with your parents?

Or you could just plug your ears and pretend families are spooks or social constructs or whatever.

>>15040944
>Fascists were capitalist lapdogs and I've never read any history to the contrary.
They were loyal to their people first. Capital is what crushed them and even today, which is the enemy demonized by liberal capitalism? Communists or fascists? Which is the true enemy? You know the answer to this.

But fascism isn't enough, and it is sadly dead, we need a new movement which will totally challenge capital, that will put the people above all and cut down the entire system at the root. Reject materialism, reject humanism, reject the very notion that caring for your people is 'idpol'.