/lit/ - Literature

Why do so many atheists look unkempt and dysgenic, and if not, are very unpleasant people?
There's this guy, Edward Dutton, who thinks religiousness is actually an adaptive evolutionary trait, which is why atheists tend to be fond of self-sterilization and socially corrosive ideas not otherwise about theism, really. If you're capable of perceiving agencies (wolves or snakes in the wild), you're more likely to pay attention and survive.

It's all starting to make sense. Dawkins has an evil phenotype, the kind of evil Englishman physiognomy that people like Tony Blair have. And of course, (((Krauss))) was involved with (((Epstein))). Pinker and Harris also have descent from the tribe.
The prominent atheists, like Dawkins or Dennett, at least look put together and some have children, compared to the bulk of dedicated atheists, who are awash with dysgenic and unfit qualities. Which is clear when you go further down the hierarchy, towards the youtube/reddit atheists.
Matt Dillahunty is literally a cuck. The Amazing Atheist shoves foreign objects into his anus. Aron Ra clearly has some brain deformities. And each of these are overweight and highly neurotic.