/lit/ - Literature

>>13504625
>pic

>>13327351
dont want that garbage, rererolla

>>12464080
>*

>>12457520
>when we see eventually see

Why the debate about God's existance never evolve towards something more usefull like if instead of trying to prove if God exist, we argue is God is an usefull concept to society.

I see over history, atheist people tend to have sub replacement levels, lack of morality, love for hedonism, lack of meaning in life and overall degeneracy.

In the end atheists countries always devolve and collapse.

God may be a social construct for all we care, but isn't most of human society also human constructs and they exist for a reason?

meh, women are whores, they always cheat on better looking guys while staying with the beta for the bucks.

redpilled guys know this, only betas think women would be loyal to guys and they think she only had two partners when she fucked the entire team in school.

good on you, you triggered a bunch of lit betas.

>70% of lit students are female
>50% of all books sold are romance
>romance is the biggest genre in literature
>9 of 10 first novels that become a hit are written by females
>Harry potter was written by a female
>Stephen king writes in a female style of common daily language
>all best sellers are about daily life issues of normal people (female topics)
>male fiction sells less than female centered fiction

>>12161761
>>12161814
>wikipedia
these niggers aren't even being ironic.

>you’ve written something? what’s it called?

99.99% of this board can't even give me a proper definition of what is good writing, less alone tell me what constitutes good writing, as in what techniques do writers use for acomplishing this goal.

Stay mad retards with your trashy creative advice you learned in your ohio nigger CC.

Just give me a proper definition of what consitutes good writing, IF YOU CAN, dumb negroes.

I think both capitalism and marxism are equally retarded as fuck, and fascism is just incel pol larping and retarded as well.

I do feel like all economic schools are stupid as fuck.

Is there one that considers that the state is the natural evolution of female hypergamy and that a stateless society is literally imposible for humans?

I also think the state serves important vital functions, and there's important things that dont' serve an economic goal, so the free market can't easily evaluate them, like culture, animal shelters and healthcare.

I also think open borders is a bad idea, but I don't think a monoracial pure country is not the end of the world, I also think that races IQ determine their social position.

Also, races diferent looks put them at diferent places in the social ladder, and that whites for this reason are at the top of the social hierarchy.

I also think comunism is utterly utanaible and their totalitarian results are just the biological reality humans can't live in stateless society (we're hypergamous).
Also socialism is just muh state welfare and it bankrupt a nation because you end up with millions of lazy niggers.
Also totalitarianism schools are dumb as fuck because they lack social mobility and just collapses because of this.
Also anarchism lack a proper social structure and anarchist can't explain to me how they keep society at bay from enemies without a prison system and police, which means they would have to tax people to support this, which means logically things like a treasure, and some people to collect and other people that keeps track of people that avoid paying taxes.

Reading fiction is for women and children.

Why is reading lots of literature a better writing advice than reading books about grammar, figures of speech, rethoric, oratory, metric, puntuaction and writer advice books?

Why most college profesors and people on post bachelor courses are still fucking retarded on topics that aren't from his degree but are like basic general culture?

Like most college professors would be utterly retarded on things like investment, basic economics (most socialists professors), basics of politics, religion, art, film.

Is like their opinions outside their field of expertise are not diferent than the average retard who is a high school dropout.

Is the NPC theory true?

>talk to someone
>say "utilize" during the conversation
>wow dude that's such a pretentious word, stop trying to talk like a smart person

''Lynne Miyake’s background is in classical Japanese literature, and she works extensively in the narrative prose and diary literature traditions of the 10th through 12th centuries. In particular, she examines the different narrative strategies employed by authors, narrators and readers in the creation of the textual experience. She also looks at how gender is configured through the various players, for example, in a narrator who is a continuum composite of male and female rather than simply one or the other.

Recently, her studies have included the intersection between contemporary authors, scholars and filmmakers and classical Japanese literature—how the likes of a classical Japanese scholar and former attendant to the Japanese royal family (Iwasa Miyoko in "Through the Eyes of a Courtlady") and a British filmmaker (Peter Greenaway in "Pillow Book") re-make and re-enact textual moments from classical Japanese literature.

Areas of Expertise
JAPANESE

Cultural Studies
Feminist Theory
Poststructuralism
Narratology
Japanese Classical Narratives and Diary Literature''

>Cultural Studies
>Poststructuralism
>Feminist Theory

And I suppose we should ''interpret'' the works of the past too right? And we probably should critique them too, right anon?

And all that according to our contemporary sensibilities, right anon?

Right anon?

Right
i
g
h
t

Anon?
n
o
n?

>>11804586
>toxic masculinity
>disturbing expose of Alt-Right

>Donna Zuckerberg
>Zuckerberg

How did the English language end up being so prominent instead of, say, French? Was Shakesmeme that good?

>what if Kaczynski wasn't a 150 IQ math prodigy, but a narcissistic Twitter memester instead - the book

>>11725893
>>11726116

The problem with this assessment is that it overlooks the fact that all these people were indoctrinated and forced into reading it.
If someone convinces you that a certain book contains the literal word of God then chances are you are going to consider it the greatest and most important thing written, ever.
But the question is, can it stand on its own, or does it need all the myth and prestige built around it for it to be even worth the paper its printed on?

In short, it is the most shilled book in all of history, so popularity is a wildly deceiving measure

>>11683704
>2 Volumes
>Not splitting it by OT and NT

>till

>>11321371
>quora

>like analytical philosophy
>but also enjoy continental philosophy
Why can't we just get along?