/lit/ - Literature

>>21654560
What can I say anon. You're just not very intelligent. Which is especially funny considering the authoritarian tone you began your original post with. But even someone like you is capable of creating worthwhile art, so give it your best shot.
>I think you're the one who's actually lacking any kind of artistic ability
Missed my point entirely of course hehe.
>Some people are good at some things, and other people are good at other things
Still don't get it. It's not a "thing" we're talking about.
>don't minimize art to be 'accessible' so that everyone who can't make art gets to make art
You're minimising art to make it something that's yours. Art will never belong to you. It's bigger than a "thing." And I never disagreed that some people are naturally shit at art and some are great.
>I'll never have a big dick and women will never swoon over me and want me
We know. No wonder you need an identity so bad.
>Art is not a science (pun not intended)
Art is not a science, it is the science. The science of being.
>you're not a feeler
More midwit depth psychology.
>you'll probably start debating
Kind of like you're doing huh.
>An artist expresses, a scientist uncovers the truth.
Already proved this dichotomy false. This is the death of art.