/lit/ - Literature

>>11177532
>do you want me to give you a next-to useless bit-sized version so you can say you know it?
Stop projecting, you retarded child. I don't do those things because unlike you, I'd be embarrassed to be calling people out only to tell them to go read shit like I'm some disgusting donkey-brained feminist.
>Probably like you read the rest of your philosophy, so you can say you have read it but make no effort to understand thought or implication.
Quite the opposite, which is why I don't drop what I'm reading because a harebrained idiot only drops names in a forum but can't express what he wanted to say to begin with. You do realize that when you tell someone to go read something you're essentially putting a close to the conversation? Instead you could convey your idea as best you can in this format, and go on with the conversation, you know, AS NORMAL FUCKING PEOPLE DO.
>Fine, summarize the phenomenology of spirit in 100 words the best you can, and if you actually capture the important parts
Why, so you can tell me I did it badly and then refuse to post what you should've posted in your initial fucking reply rather than go through all of this, you insipid imbecile?