/lit/ - Literature

>>22661311
What if God only punishes those who believe in him?

Plato's remembrance theory was never formally refuted

>>22503129
I... I don't know.

>>20295422
>boys-stones

Guess I think I have stumbled onto something big.

So about a month ago I had been trying to read Fanged Noumena and had become frustrated because so little of it was making sense. Eventually I became so upset that I threw the book across the room and started screaming how fucking stupid Nick Land was, how he was nothing but a circle jerking idiot.

I continued to nurse these sentiments and to belittle Land over the next few days and when I picked the book up something amazing happened: everything I was reading had become perfectly understandable. If I ever came to a section that threw me a little I would just remind myself that this book was written by a literal retard and then the passage would make itself clear.

I was intrigued by this phenomenon so I decided to try it out on other authors. I dove into the Phenomenology of Spirit, continually reminding myself that Hegel was a dumb cunt who couldn't possibly have said anything intelligent. It was like veils falling from the face of Isis and the text could not have been easier to grasp. Same thing for Deleuze and Derrida.

Guys I think I've done it. I've cut through the Gordian knot that all of these supposed geniuses tie their literature up in. Has anyone else experienced this? It is really an uncanny sensation. Seriously go and try it. Spend a few days calling Kant a faggot and then try reading through the Critique of Pure Reason. It'll seem like child's play.

I literally can't

>>11062076
A-Anon... how old is that girl?