/lit/ - Literature

>>1995292
>a monopoly with your own private army
>What the fuck does this even mean?

And you suggest I am incapable of reading? It's self-explanatory, but I'll re-iterate with synonyms: a privatized military force owned by a rich corporation. You know, the topic of the thread? The thing OP mentioned? "Privatized police forces, military and courts"?

You can't exactly fund a military if you're not rich, so only the very wealthy would be able to maintain privatized militaries, thereby granting them unlimited power with no balancing governmental fore to keep any semblance of justice.

>Stop with your half-assed first guesses at how it might work, and read a little about it. You might learn something.

In other words completely disregard everything you said and look it up myself? I am basing my questions off of your assertion. This is the third time I'm asking you how any kind of system could work with privatized militaries in the hands of corporations and instead of answering me you tell me to look it up myself. That's not how a debate works. Either provide me with some kind of fact or don't bring it up at all.

>And for Christ's sake, I wasn't advocating for the system to be used in the modern world.

OP specifically says:
>Do Libertarians actually advocate

Now when you post an example of a system I am assuming you are advocating it since that is the point of the thread. Unless you address the implausibility of any justice taking place in a system where corporations control all of the military power I am not going to continue wasting my time.