/lit/ - Literature

>>7056865
Because both are written from a male perspective? Have you seen the way women write about female sexuality? It usually involves blood, placentas, and some degree of unpleasantness. Men, being attracted to women, just idealize their sexuality into "Rainbows and spice" for them.

>>4857605
You're right, they don't, but it does mean that you cannot dismiss it as an unverified miracle or an unreliable source as Hitchens does. Did you even read my post?

>>4660921
>yfw those two people who enjoy existing were the product of two other people
>yfw all the people who enjoy existing have been the product of other people
>yfw people who enjoy existing are likely the product of other people who enjoy existing because there's just so damn much of them and they keep existing near each other
>yfw it's statistically more likely that the children of two people who enjoy existing will also enjoy existing