/lit/ - Literature

>>17666214
Let’s pretend you’re asking the question now.
They’re stupid because they’re inefficient and quite destructive. The majority suffer for the comforts of the few. Pinker is a liar shill for the establishment. After reading a tone of history I feel the experiment has failed and I look forward to something to take its place. We obviously can’t go back like an Ellul, Camatte or Kaczynski would prescribe

>>17666224
Read some history. They’re always stupid.
>>17666247
Or the Chiapas actually. The CIA aren’t there. No. That’s like taking the lottery winner escape. My conscious wouldn’t rest easily at all. I want everyone in a better world

>>17630432
He puts together a good reconfiguration of Bookchin’s ideas for unifying tanky and anarchist methods. A good answer to the old “warlords” defense.
Reminds me though. Does anyone know of a good book on subcom Marcos? That’s an interesting story too. Started out a vanguardist and has since become a second fiddle to the locals he once led.