/lit/ - Literature

>>2131546

so intellectuals are forced to create a more simplistic and thus less effective model to communicate to the degenerate masses such as myself?

Is democracy really so patronising?
Am I expecting too much?

>polytheism
why so dumb, the most perfect thing imaginable would be one unified thing/everything. Christianity is still the best explanation for existence and there's too much prophetic coincidences in the Bible for it to all be garbledy-goop.

Any polytheists on /lit/?

L'Etranger - Albert Camus
with
Pyramid Song - Radiohead

There was nothing to fear and nothing to doubt.

>>1637118

Of course lust and love are a natural part of the human experience, absurd and abstract romanticisation of love are not an inevitable part of existence.

I don't think great writers need to resort to using societal perceptions when they talk about love. I think they ultimately pollute our understanding.

>>1637131

I don't know, I don't think I like the world enough to be a humanist.

It's too close to existentialism, anyway.

>>1613979
>L'on, au Canada, apprend de lui à lycée. Ça me fait vouloir lire sa «recherche»...
speak real french please.

>>1613987
>I quite like the anti-elitist and anti-intellectual aspects of American culture sometimes.
>I quite like the anti-elitist and anti-intellectual
>anti-elitist and anti-intellectual
>Truman Capote !!cO9KVBDtkqQ
>anti-elitist and anti-intellectual

>mfw tybrax has a low opinion of me

>>1581558

>semantics
>worth arguing over

>>1561901

>saging a literature thread

>about a certain event, such as a town in the former soviet union or a person that lived there

>juggalos
>literate

DENNA WAS SO FUCKING ANNOYING IN THE NAME OF THE WIND
I RAGED AT HER CHARACTER EVERY SECOND I READ THAT BOOK
the rest was pleasant

354254nlfjbf;ljbnf;dlnb;ldfnb;lgfknb;ln5;tjbr;ljtb54tfj

>I write like William Shakespeare