[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22065794 [View]
File: 2.99 MB, 720x900, 1669320135701465.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22065794

>Plato's Repulbic, 341c2
>ὥσπερ, ἔφην ἐγώ, εἴ με ἔροιο εἰ ἐξαρκεῖ σώματι εἶναι σώματι...
my notes say that the second σώματι is part of the predicate with εἶναι in a dependent clause, which by itself makes sense, but says it is "drawn into" the dative by the preceding dative. I believe I have seen this with relative clauses before, being "drawn into" the same case as their antecedent (assumed or explicit), but what exactly do you call this phenomenon?

>> No.21484634 [View]
File: 2.99 MB, 720x900, 1669320135701465.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21484634

>>21484628

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]