/lit/ - Literature

>>17004845
>>17004975
>>17005019
>>17005109
>>17005161
No way fag, Greek noses are for the genuine patrician. The searchers after truth and health.

>>16120408
No, Breker was discredited and swept away after the war as an over the top ideologically ridiculous propagandist, with his artworks being equivalent to nothing more than silly figures of some constipated and supposedly irrational belief in Fascism and specifically National Socialism.

Where in actual fact he is overrated by /pol/ack retards but is still one of the greatest sculptures to ever live. Undoubtedly he would have initiated a new age of art in sculpture if Fascism had survived.

>>14108974
How does a man who is so far above all others he meets in respect to intelligence, creativity, general will, exceptionally good looks, height( 6 ft 4), fitness, charisma, social intelligence and dominance.

It just isn't fair bros, no one understands.

T. Entp

So why is there any definition of free will apart from Plato's belief of the good(or alternatively Hegel's truth), which is beings in accordance with themselves. Is the banked rock under the stream of a waterfall not free to be as it is? And humans all the more complex and beautiful they are, free to be as they are? Just as a man of his particular time is free to be as he is: for as Hegel says "no man can over-leap his time". The question of free will as some sort of necessary infinitude of possibility's is wrong in its premise.

For man, there are many choices; but an infallibility of choice between them.

>>14038013
It's a completely self destroying ideal.

Man is in, and only shall be, in his greatest throws of passion and pleasure while in self sacrifice, to die for other. Thus it makes no real sense (know the difference between belief, effect and cause). And if one attempts to justify it with a (metaphysical) system of necessity then it is a direct contradiction of the central tenets of egoism. Egoism is the oneself that follows ego firstly. To justify ego by system is to follow system firstly and ego as result - therefore destroying any possibility of the ego.

Pure baseless idolatry for those who wish to indulge, in sin or in pity.

>>13831745
Don't feel like writing anything longer but understand that. Thought is pattern, all is pattern because understanding is a predicative of thought. All is a mentality in which we ourselves exist within, and as Socrates taught one can only be at the freest to see truth, the things in themselves, apart from limited representation. Philosophy, a pattern of a pattern, beyond limited 3 dimensions, and 4 by some instances. Up is down and down up, left nor right. It simply is by its own emotive context. A mentality by which we now know ourselves and by that, others. I could write for a very long time on such a subject; it leads me to another question. These recent conclusions makes one think as if perception is but the thought of a thought. By its own self reflection is it some innate and continually enduring being. Which sustains it as something apart from phenomenological existence, but not from progression - as self actualisation.

Hope this answered your question anon.

>Top 5 books of the Old Testament
>Top 5 books of the New Testament
>Top 5 books of both Old and New Testaments

Explain why.