/lit/ - Literature

>>16936069
All they have left is doomsaying. "Your roastie wife will leave you, lol." "Your kids will become trannies, lol." These are all fables they tell themselves to make themselves feel better about their dead end existence, while it is possible that you will experience more joy and less dysfunction than they, the childless and possibly unmarried, will.

"Anti-natalists" care so much about preventing pain; they should go out and work at a soup kitchen, something they can exert an influence on. They can never change people's minds on the internet, especially not with such piss-poor arguments (and yet they keep telling you to "read this book" or "read that book;" but it they themselves had read these books, surely their arguments would be better). Instead, they waste their time causing more needless pain to themselves and others, never changing anything, and only not doing something that isn't difficult in the first place (abstain from sex, or get a vasectomy and have sex).

Reasons for reproduction are not all selfish or egoistic; you cannot say that you "cannot be concerned for the wellbeing or pleasure of a nonexistent entity." You can, because it is a potential being, just as anti-natalists are concerned with preventing such a being's potential suffering.

If you care so much about science and empiricism, but the aforementioned cannot save you from your state, are they really so worthy before God, with Whom all things are possible?