[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.17953287 [View]
File: 46 KB, 572x685, 1592025501353.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17953287

Whoa so this is the level of /lit/ philosophy. whoaaaaa

>> No.16658833 [View]
File: 46 KB, 572x685, 1460732686878.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16658833

>>16654507
haha what a retard

>> No.16601077 [View]
File: 46 KB, 572x685, 1460732686878.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16601077

>>16591777
It literally goes for the same price though... Am I the retarded one for expecting people on lit to do basic things like read?

>> No.15595052 [View]
File: 46 KB, 572x685, 1460732686878.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15595052

>>15594642
>epub
>no formatting
>this faggot has been trying to read converted .txt files the whole time and is pissed he has no formatting
>reads on a tablet
you're a whole bowl of retard, aren't you?

>> No.8675690 [View]
File: 46 KB, 572x685, 1452636815307.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8675690

>>8675682
>reality

>> No.8607951 [View]
File: 46 KB, 572x685, 1476130838955.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8607951

>>8607746
The goal of science is to describe the world, the goal of philosophy is to understand it. Every scientist operates under some implicit philosophical framework, whether that be realism, falsificationism, relativism, etc. And most of the answers you'll get in this thread are people trying to justify philosophy without any real understanding of the philosophy of science or philosophy of physics, which is a very poor way to go about it. Science will not and does not even aim to explain everything 'conclusively'. It provides models that fit experimental data, nothing more.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]