/lit/ - Literature

>>20451568
what cannot you believe?

you've looked at the same evidence that causes these people to go down the rabbit hole and said "this makes sense"?

i don't agree with them but i know why they think it

>>18291816
On the other hand, a bad logical game can give rise to silly ideas. Language games are therefore no reason for rejecting them but, on the contrary, the best chance for a successful communication.

Traditionally the philosopher believed he had the right to decide what constitutes the truth of propositions. The two variants of this idea are often referred to as neutral monism and pluralism.