/lit/ - Literature

>>6918214
I agree with most of what you have to say. I however didn't mean that we attempt to return to a state of non-being through the act of being. What I meant was that in the act of being you are the being you act to be, so if you're current being is concerned with a self-imposed obligation to read and understand what I'm trying to say that is exactly the end to what you're being is attempting to go to. The return to non-being is after you have read and perceivably understood my post then you are confronted by it by default, since the previous being has served its purpose and to continue being that exact being without an opportunity to read what I've written (since you can only re-read it now, and build on your own understanding of it plus possible derive more from the post again, which is an altogether different act of being) would be impossible as that being is no more: You return then, after the fulfillment of the being's course, to a state of indecision to what course of action to take next, which is a state of non-being because of the fact that you question what you would like or have to do next, that is you have surpassed your previous being which was concerned with reading my post and now reflect on your having-done-so, through the action of surpassing the being you transcend it back to a non-being state (as which was how you were before you decided you wanted to read my post). In this non-being state you do not identify with the previous non-being, for 1, it was a different you, and 2, you may be able to recall the emotional connections to that being through memory you now see it as a thing alien to your state of being or non-being now, it was given a purpose and a peculiar identity for being which you now can not replicate exactly.

It is also true that in that indecisive state between different beings that have a sense of being-in-the-world where you transcend them by going into a non-being state (and it might be important here to clarify what I mean by 'non-being' in context to avoid confusion; I mean it is simple not the being it was before the surpassing, not the one it will become afterwards, but most importantly it doesn't have a sense of being-in-the-world, that is to say it doesn't have an assigned identity which gives it purpose, for it is the state where such things are determined) is not a state of nothingness as a sense of being outside of being is considered for possible action. This means you look at possible beings which you might adopt as an other as only you can forcibly bring it into existence.

My point was that we do the exact opposite of what you believe I posited, I say we continually rush to a being of being-in-the-world, with a specific purpose and identity, if only until it has served its purpose, or if you prefer, run its course, then the rush to being starts again.

1/2.

buying gf

In this thread we rhyme
Doesn't matter if it's not worth a dime
No worked on pieces
Just spontaneous releases

>>6669383
Judging, sure, but that's very different from applying peer pressure through relative harassment. 2 different things really.

>>6669385
I'm not "fine" with it. But then I might not be a consenting player, and if I'm not then why are you playing a game with somebody that's not interested?

You know what's it's called when you cut a lizard's tail off? Torture. It's called torture and bullying.

>>6613117
Personally -- of coarse it is a childish emotion derived thought process from me -- I dislike it because I imagine faggots getting off on a paragraph describing a fiery dragon or skyward castle or some other fantasy porn AND then ignoring that the story (or not noticing seeing as their imagination is now on overdrive and getting lust in the head over the towering inferno or some shit) is based on bigoted, racist, classist crap.
Like I said I understand how childish and vain the emotion is that runs me the wrong way and if you don't understand it yet, I'll draw you a sad self-reflection:
I'm sad that people can't or don't digest and analyze input as I do, I'm sad that I can't get an orgasm whilst watching avengers: age of Altron
I'm sad that I can't connect with my contemporaries,
I'm sad that, though occasionally I get elitist thoughts in the end I only feel alienated and lonely
Broken and unloved

Of coarse I shalnt never admit this to anybody : because I can't expect ppl who enjoy that to have the aptitude to offer me anything more than bronze pity
Or worse: ridicule, open or perceivably skin deep (it's always perceivable :(

>not style

>>6608629
Ppl relate to The Alchemist too. Or they think they do. The void observations and indulgences are porn for the nihilistic minded. I am one of those, and I liked the indulgent part of it. The observations are incredibly juvenile though, his economic ones on particular are like copy paste out of The Economist but not even close to that quality. It's like the exposition Camus does in The Stranger -- any person with reasonable years under his belt and is even remotely self-conscious of life could AND SHOULDN'T make.

>>6606735
After a certain amount of drug induced cerebral damage people should stop posting.