/lit/ - Literature

Almost all philosophers were neurotic, mentally ill, pathetic INCELS, and you spend all your time reading what they had to say, anon. Why? Do you want to turn out to be just like them?
You should only read the works of respectable men that their peers look up to and depend on. Why would you read the words of the UNFUCKABLE Kant instead of Jocko Willink, Navy Seal, leader of men? "Start with the Greeks" needs to be replaced with "Start with JOCKO WILLINK."

Most authors are miserable, neurotic perma-virgins that never found peace. And you read them expecting you won't become JUST LIKE them?
You should only read the books of people that have accomplished something in their lives, are honorable, well-respected members of society, and have now sat down to put it in paper. 'Start with the Greeks' should be replaced with 'Start with Jocko Willink'.

Every single philosopher has been a neurotic miserable incel. Why do you read them? To become like them? If they couldn't solve their own problems, how can they be trusted with solving anyone else's?
You should be reading people like Jocko Willink. Men of ACTION, that are looked up to by their friends and family, acting like PILLARS for everyone around them. These are the mean who are happy, with their shit together and something to teach you.

>>17475905
Every single person that tried to "make sense of this irrational world" ended up being a neurotic schizophrenic incel that self-destructed.
On the other hand, people like Jocko Willink, that simply ACT and face problems as OPPORTUNITIES enjoy an excellent quality of life and are looked up to by their peers.