/lit/ - Literature

>>15567284
I think that's called a diet

>>13941365
this is the worst thread i have ever seen on this board. i hope you know you are a major pansy and i want to rape you

>>13769564
Because it's self-evident that we should. It's hard to 'bother' because anything worth doing is hard; it's the story of the fall silly

>>13505303
>23
>mechanic
>government whistle-blower
>Nature by Emerson

>>13089698
fucking based

>>13079055
>>13079057
gotcha, ty

>>13063021
Jared Taylor is a smart guy. I plan to pick up some of his books. Unfortunately he gets labeled a 'white supremacist' even though all he advocates is that people stay with their kind because they WANT to ,not because they have to. He steers clear of the "Conservative DESTROYS Libtard" meme quite well

>>13048819
Because just like all things, (music, movies, anime, tv shows, etc.) normal people have shit taste. Then the tasteless masses bump their shit up in popularity and it's considered 'great' solely on the basis of its popularity.

Having an argument with a friend whom I think lacks virtue and morality. I tell them so but they so easily dismiss it with the 'morality is subjective and only based on the individual, therefore my acts aren't necessarily deplorable or wrong'. I have no reasonable response to this because I agree things are subjective in thought but are implemented on a societal level for a reason. I strongly feel that outlook isn't justified, it's an excuse to not hold oneself accountable. My question is what is a counter-argument so such a dismissive outlook? I know it's healthier to hold yourself to a standard but I'm getting BTFO so easily with this one simple response and it's quite frustrating.