/lit/ - Literature

>>21055047
>can somebody explain to me like I'm an idiot why people say trump is THE postmodern president?

He is the embodiment of the destruction/removal of the conventional political structure. For good or ill, regardless of your political position he embodies everything that is wrong with the current system.

>>20922749
Have not read that one, Pagan Imperialism is a big read. Id recommend National-Socialism: The Biological Worldview, Mein Kampf and Kurt Eggers. Between the three I found sufficient motivation to change for the better.

>>20733074
>It astonishes me that anyone can be a liberal at this point who does not directly monetarily benefit from the system

Every stage of their life from early education to what they entertain themselves with now is geared towards the belief that a liberal democracy is the pinnacle of human society and the only way to achieve happiness. This is proven false by looking out the front door.

>>19705564
I did believe in it. But that was when my nation was relatively homogenous and things were good. Now i reject it wholesale and desire an ethnic connection to the ruling class.

I hope i live long enough to see it rise.

>>18957225
I don't have anything against diversity in theory, I respect people as individuals and believe ideally mankind needs to set aside differences and live in harmony, but in reality there are clearly flaws, people are simply tribal and often don't mix well. Just look at all the tribal behavior in this thread. Also this forcing of "diversity" into all aspects of culture is toxic and setting us backwards in terms of genuine positive relations among different people.

The West claims with pride to be multicultural but it really seems to be one culture with several subcultures that share similar views, which I find to be monocultural; a mix of cultures that are not similar doesn't exist, for the one in power will make it disappear i.e. cultures with opposing views are not tolerated. Does real multiculturism exist and is it possible to have such society(I think not and that is what pic related is about)? Is there recommended literature on this? Am I taking multiculturism too literal?

>>18535969
>they suggest handing over supreme power to the government (risking it being hijacked by those same capitalists anyway)
This is a problem if, after anihilating the financial class, you don't substitute it by an aristocracy (aka warrior caste).
>>18535893
And to answer your question, OP: I could give you diagnoses, but I can't think of any as answers. Maybe the Bhagavad Gita, since it asks you to stop willing.

To complete my answer (>>18536380)
>So a keep of white supremacists isn’t going to find much use for them and will either have to grow up or turn to banditry and face retaliations
Do you want a ethnically heterogenous society? Because W.S. won't "exist" (they might praise their community more over others, but there wouldn't be foreigners coming around). Also, what you call "white supremacists" are most of the time just that: a people who have a healthy prejudice for their comunity (like you and me have a prejudice for our families).
also pic rel

You just replied, I've seen it. It'll take me a bit to respond.

>>18003039
yup

>>17051425
Not sure I'm taking your point here... Trump is an elite. He's the better option because he's slowed down mass-immigration and increased populist sentiment, but he's still happy to play the racial pandering game (just to a lesser extent). These people don't truly care about the long-term, if a country becomes too unstable they will take their liquid assets and leave.

The only honestly caring, non-establishment candidate I've seen in the U.S. is Ron Paul, and even he doesn't call out anti-whiteness.

But if you seriously think any leader would be able to turn a multi-racial population into coombaya land, you're kidding yourself. All they can do is become more totalitarian to keep a lid on things.

>>15934741

>>15592317
Well said. Ethnos is critical though; everything is downstream from genetics, and divergent populations represent divergent interests (a state exists to safeguard the interests of a people — introducing additional peoples dangerously compromises that paradigm).

Literally ALL these problems could be avoided if there were no multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is a disease to any society.

>>13808407

>"Start with the Greeks"
-- /lit/ - All Fucking Niggers Must Hang

Wtf, I hate Aristotle now!

>>9869393
>hehetheir simply inferior to us as white men
i suspect you're being ironic here. actually yeah they are inferior on a group basis but you can always make individual exceptions. the question is do you really want to. what good is that for other than virtue signalling?