/lit/ - Literature

>have my mom trick a qt into falling in love with me
>bang her until I get sick of it and go off fund a city or something
>she kills herself lmao

>>10094228
Do you classify every positive feedback as pleasure?
If I choose to abstain from an earthly delight, I may feel healthier, have a free consciousness, feel more focused, be proud of my restraint, etc. But it doesn't seem right to call those ''good'' feelings pleasure, I mean, hedonism through asceticism? Actually that's starting to sound like some Lacanian stuff...

Anyway, I just think there's more to the human experience than ''feels good''. There's a plethora of positive emotions and sensations we can experience but not all of them are what we usually associate with the word pleasure. If you're going to reduce hedonism to the pursuit of happiness, then nothing distinguishes it from any other ethical philosophy.

I'm not arguing against hedonism, just against the ''everything is hedonistic'' reduction.

>>10094632
It's not the same things because, contrary to /pol/tards and the memes they adore, authors like Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze, Adorno and so on are actual good representatives of the left and warrant respect. If right-wingers wanna talk about Evola, Schmitt, Mill, etc then they're taken seriously, we do talk about these guys all the time, they're only shushed when they shitpost Kermit and infowars nuts.