/lit/ - Literature

>>14106091
Anyways the genre of art I am making is obviously somewhere within the category of "religious cult." But it is a cult of anti-religion: New Atheism on steroids. It retains ALL the commitments of the New Atheism movement while adding positive thesis about the nature of human knowledge and experience which supercharges it with positive metaconstructivist praxis to enhance New Atheist deconstructivist skepticism. This stance is evoked by Carl Sagan in this video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLigBYhdUDs )

>We wish to pursue the truth no-matter where it leads. But to find the truth we need imagination and skepticism both. We will not be afraid to speculate. But we will be careful to distinguish speculation from fact.

Anyways the idea of a "cult of anti-religion" is why Discordianism and parody religion is incredibly relevant: >>14101390
It just so happens that there is already a parody religion that was undeniably inspired by Whiteheaden thought: Discordianism. In fact Discordianism is process-relational thought translated into mythical and religious allegory.

At this point hopefully sensitive paranoia is tingling because how this so masterfully interlocks with the idea of a memetically emergent project to Complete the System of Radical Empiricism. Perhaps there is a massive conspiracy of enlightened atheistic intellectuals and artists behind some master plot to expose the Christian Nazi conspiracy, OR an even more strange and bizarre possibility is that there was no true conspiracy among such lines, and the true "conspirators" are merely forces of memetic evolution. I tend to lean towards the latter because it is much more interesting anyways if it is true.

So what's left for this anti-cult cult of evolution? To be a true cult, it must be a personality cult, and for this purpose it needs a mascot, an exemplary representation of the organization as organization ambassador. The best candidate is the one who has made themselves into the best individual actualization of the core structure behind the organization. So there's two parts to this emergent organization: the organization itself (the extended network of relationships involving it, centered no nobody in particular) and a particular self-organization corresponding to the concrescence of the emergent organization into actual organization. I am the ringleader of ringleaders in the gang of gangs, Q.E.D.

>>12445251
>what the Matrix exposes are the fundamental limitations of political theology, the inherent impossibility of construing the transcendent political ideality in terms of the largest possible crowd.

What prevents this infinity is a universal language of aboutness in which to do a universal debugging of the Logos virus. There is one that has the property of recursion found in the real world: >>12443155

>>12100236
If you've fallen into the trap of reductive determinism, you can't possibly understand. Humans are created from bottom-up causal influence but they also have top-down self-creative ability. This isn't an ability, but a delicate skill that can be cultivated to various degrees, though always existing within constraints. Capital is a memetic parasite that replaces self-awareness (self-creative ability) with programmatic desire.