/lit/ - Literature

based misogynyposters

i love each and every one of you

>>19097274
>my dude
>redditspacing
remember this is what you're up against, normalfaggot tourists

The contemporary female exists purely to indulge in aesthetic form. They seek no higher understanding. All actions become performances, all performances are moral judgments. She is the counterpart to Nietzsche last man.

>>17397194
>what woman want
to be vindicated in there contradicting beliefs (as in, to be abused but told its love, but that's its sexist and also impowering)

>>15077852

>>14602034
this
What a faggoty little thread
Only beta males think that women are complex, because they refuse to acknowledge the simplest explanation for their infantile behaviour
Seriously, once you realise that women are emotionally and intellectually children, it becomes glaringly obvious, and you can't have anything but contempt for them
Sexually attractive men and sexually repulsive men know this automatically from experience, for these are the only men to whom women expose their true nature
The bluepilled losers in the middle (the vast majority of men), who are neither attractive or repulsive, but neutrally sexually charged, are the ones who have placed women on their pedastal, and grovel at their feet for a crumb of pussy, and then call them mysterious when they act like children
Grow the fuck up

>>8807806
Actually it's not implying that, quite the contrary.
Have another.

How can you not hate women?

I love how this board falls for the OP bait on a daily basis, shit's crazy man.

>>7471858
my image...

>"New gym Posing lol"

What did she mean by this?

You wouldn't be too far from reality.

>>7404693
That's a good summary. What I find more interesting is how the opposite is the case for most men, essentially a just-world fallacy.

The reality of modern dating can't be the way that it is, because if it did, that means manipulative assholes who think women are inferior are getting laid. And any self-professed nice guy who complains about having woman problems must not really be nice and must actually be a manipulative and entitled ass. Because if he were actually nice, it means that genuinely nice guys aren't getting laid.

So we see this veil of arguments: PUA doesn't work -- it's all made up lies and stories by losers on the internet. In the few cases it does work, those women are damaged, but it doesn't work on real, normal women. And in the few cases it does, it's all through lies and deception and manipulation and trickery. And in any other cases, it's all through rape.

And any time any guy complains that he had woman problems when he tried things the normal, conventional, friendly, nice guy way, it's because he's unwashed and hideous and unrealistically expects to succeed without taking the time to look good and learn basic social skills. But if he's not like that, then it's because he's only approaching super-models instead of realistic average women. But if it's not that, then it's because he's actually desperate and sending out invisible desperation signals and turning women off. But if it's not that, it's because he's actually an entitled misogynist and is sending out invisible entitlement signals and turning women off. But if it's not that, he's probably raping people.