[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18700503 [View]
File: 180 KB, 56x56, 1596495777704.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18700503

finally on chapter 15/15
don't care if it's meh, don't care if people don't even read it. I'm finally on the verge of actually pulling something out of my own head and putting it down on paper, seeing it all the way to the end.
shit's alright :)

>> No.17685531 [View]
File: 180 KB, 56x56, 1614501407527.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17685531

What are some books that talk about breaking routine habit loops and overcoming that initial no and then caving in as the day goes on ? Is it truly a mind over matter situation. Is there any cheats so i dont have to feel the mentally cyclone that comes over me?

>> No.16324403 [View]
File: 180 KB, 56x56, 1599634189696.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16324403

>>16323913
0
I shitpost all day

>> No.15219602 [View]
File: 180 KB, 56x56, Pufferfish gif.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15219602

Why are commies so bad at arguing? Whenever you ask them to prove anything, it's always either insults or "ugggh it's not my job to educate you!".
At least /pol/ learned that mass infographic dumps dont really convince anyone who isnt already converted.

>> No.15106233 [View]
File: 180 KB, 56x56, Pufferfish gif.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106233

>>15106210
I was gonna say that i only read books to brag about it on the internet, but then i realize i only really read books to give myself the illusion that im smart and did something productive. I barely remember most books that i read anyway.

>> No.15026966 [View]
File: 180 KB, 56x56, Pufferfish gif.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15026966

>>15026660
OP here, you said that in a copypasta that's usually just used to mock the position you took, rather than promote it. And i have read some Carl Schmitt, so i was wondering what works in particular youre referring to. If youre referring to him seeing politics fundamentally as a distinction between in-group/out-group, then that, while true, doesnt really adress that all forms of collectivism can be reduced to a matter of personal weakness.
and FYI, im actually supportive of nationalism, but i just phrase questions like this because /lit/ is much more eager to respond when they want to prove someone wrong than just answering a regular question.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]