/lit/ - Literature

>>14684327
I've said this before on Peterson threads, and i'll say it again:

Peterson was brought up to this site exactly by MAGA newfags in 2016 who thought Peterson was this controversial, traditionalist or even reactionary kind of intellectual. /pol/ soon took this, and some even started to believe that Peterson was a crypto-fascist who was playing 4D chess with the intellectual elites. He is not. He's been saying "i don't like nazis" since day one. All the hate from Peterson came from these same newfaggots who thought he was the intellectual who was going to save us from modern academia, when he obviously was not. When they realized he was just another liberal with little to no right wing leanings, they turned on him and started to throw shit at his work.

Now, i didn't know he "disappeared", because i don't care about him and neither should anybody on this board, simply because he's not that relevant as newfags made him out to be. He is not the next great intellectual who is going to outsmart every leftist shill in academia. He is neither the greatest problem that modern academia has. He's just an old psychologist with a dysfunctional family and a dysfunctional psyche, who from time to time can give some clever insight on interesting topics, but who also found a niche of young kids who are in dire need of recognition and will buy any self-help crap that he writes.

He's not the greatest thing in academia, nor is he the worse. Just ignore him, we don't need four fucking Peterson posts a day.