/lit/ - Literature

>>22612384
>Do you think generalized AI will be some monolith that won't vary over companies?
It is questionable if your problem field can provide the necessary training set.
Especially if you only have one product. Or if you work on safety-critical software.
Special conditions are usually the result of interfacing engineering problems as well.
The problems that companies like Boeing are facing in their software department are not problems of software engineering but of aerodynamics (among others). An aerodynamics engineer works that through with them.
The creation and maintenance (!) of a knowledge base that could be used to train an AI in such interface fields is something we cannot even fathom at the moment because we cannot even properly formalize the interfaces between the fields. With evolving standards and evolving technology, it's questionable whether it will ever work. IBM can't even keep their fucking meta-models straight. That's why you have to bring in the experts.

I know this for a very specific reason by the way.

>I have a BS in compsci and have taken a compiler course.

Very cool
I took that one too
ten years ago.
That was a couple years before i wrote a shitty PhD thesis on software engineering
Which is exactly the reason why I know about interfacing engineering fields and why I am telling you this now.

And again:
source code generation has nothing to do with compilation.

>>22612397
>By what definition? Something you just made up?
By the definition of its functionality and its usability within a software engineering workflow.

Because otherwise, as you say, it will give you a bullshit answer.

The bullshit answers are not results of a "broadened solution space" based on the implications read from your input. Instead, they are basically just white noise.

>make shit up and lie through their teeth. Like you.
Fuck, ya got me anon.

If these answers are not satisfying, oh well.

>failed revolutionary writes an epic poem about a failed revolution causing the downfall of mankind

>He thinks modernist literature has any value in a postmodernist society

>>19295882
you don't know genuinely believe you would've been anything other than a helot if you had lived in ancient Sparta, do you?

>>19102436

>>18751150
>caused by lead poisoning
We both know that at most this was a tangential factor

>>18701380
>09A is run by

>>18438828
>P&V translation

>>18302845
Isn't the whole point of your religion to shift your suffering onto an omnipotent god just so you could land in your ''perfect painless utopia where nothing ever happens'' in the ''afterlife''?

>>17572946
>you’re anti Semitic if you don’t worship your ruling class

>>17435087
>Economy based on funny money isn't just nonsensical Jew science

>>17343741
Based socially isolated schizophrenic

>>17339137
There is a minor drop for a minority of nations (most stay at the same level, only a few like Estonia and Russia see drops) and then a 10 year increase in life expectancy, and this is a bad thing to you?

The minor blip might be more due to people looting countries like Russia after the fall of communism than liberalism.

Jesus Christ anon you're properly retarded. You see a 10 year increase in life expectancy and focus on a minor oscillation that occurs after one of the biggest events in the 20th century.

>>15668308
>thinking I'll give up my ideas.

>>15663101
>that's the real butterfly