/lit/ - Literature

>>12022485
sweet
sweet sweetness

i'll read this presently. i have to relocate to my Reading Silo in a moment (and there's fucking Fresh Uncle Nick today, his blackened popcorn kernels of time-bending neurotoxin to get to as well. it's been a red-letter day for Cosmotech).

if you haven't read this, you're in for a treat. it's a complete howl of outrage directed in the *proper* directions and is entirely worth your time. i am - 'tis my nature - boringly empathetic to all sides in a debate, and ofc i like Lacan (and i have a kind of vengeful sibling rivalry feel towards Derrida, which is both affection and loathing) but Foucault is the lord of creation right now, however much the current state of things is probably not how he would have wanted things to go.

but w/ev. you don't need my meme opinions, here are some better ones. enjoy fella. and thx also for the link and the book rec, i'll be checking both of those out soon. plus i want to respond to some other posts in this thread also (>>12021322, i see ya mystikos).

https://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2017/09/Arion-Camille-Paglia-Junkbonds-Corporate-Raiders.pdf

>>24234
B-b-but I already do cardio exclusively /fit/.

>>9268156
Additionally if you google "epistemic charity" this will go much more smoothly.

Why is contemporary philosophy so inaccessible and obfuscatory?

What's stopping me from developing my own literary-critical theories with which to critique texts with? I hear that many literary critics don't actually follow under one school or another, but rather use several different theories at /once/.

Id prefer jail time over extreme torture any day

human nature

/thread

>>7156713
caught ya

>>7050448
>muh human nature