/lit/ - Literature

>>23598641
Yeah, her. You're told of her passing before she's even introduced which only makes you give even less of a fuck. Is there gonna be more of her and her dumbass butterfly tattoo that "flaps nervously"

>>22651743
"s-sure, you may have made out and clapped her cheeks on occasion, both of which I've never done, I still have something of hers you never will. Her heart."

lmao fucking kiiiiill me. Only a fat coping retard who doesn't understand women would write something like this. A woman who loves you (aka "gives you their heart") would have zero problems fucking you. I mean JUST

>Chapter 1
>dream sequence

>>21428184
>How would you have felt yesterday evening if you hadn't paid taxes to the Crown?
>OI, I SHO' LOVES DA QUEEN
>Yes, but if you had not, how would you have felt?
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN? I AIN'T DOING NO WRONGTHINK, I LOVES THE PARTY. ALLAH AKBAR
>Imagine that you didn't pay taxes to an bedazzled German Jew's haunted pussy. How would you have felt?
>DAS RACISS

>>18435329
>>18435376
>>18435477

>>18073109
lmao

>>17875733
>that's funny. I like how he triggers those NPCs with a joke. Its like how I dabb on libtards all day long.
kek, my guy

>>17420120
>if you're a "commoner" with no connections and have an incredible novel that you've written, it WILL catch on if you allow it to be read by one, two, three, four - if it's actually an amazing book
>he actually fucking believes this

>>17127494
Zizek didn't exactly stunt on him, but he didn't have to. Peterson was conceptually lost, woefully unprepared, etc. Just watching his parts was embarrassing. Iirc Zizek engaged with him in a polite kind of awkward way that saved it from feeling like a kid getting curbstomped by Messi
>>17126904
Why do you say that?
Which books?
>>17126938
If you are judging based off of Peterson debate or random youtube videos, don't. He is an obscurantist, some of his ideas are mid, but the Zizek you get exposed to outside of his serious university lectures and books is different from the Zizek you get reading his books.
>>17126949
I don't disagree on the latter point but you have to appreciate that culture and law (state, institutional rules, etc) develop reflexively. Laws encourage culture (ex. laws with no punitive aspect that just declare a moral sentiment) and culture obviously encourages laws as well as shapes its enforcement. If nothing else laws can be good discursive devices for discussing culture and belief when they are reified and then disavowed while still being strictly enforced.
>>17127108
Zizek definitely could have hammered home the clear fact that peterson had no clue what he was talking about, so their aporetic dicking around and discussing other stuff I consider a product of his courtesy rather than being incapable of "winning"

>>16725697
>listening to a woman other than your mother

>>16716887
Dean Koontz more like Dean Cuntz HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>15072343
>taking western philosophy seriously

>>15032115
Can't refute

>>14487086
>the fucking minion picture

>>14261019

>>14072535
>'And in the end, he truly lived in a Nineteen-Eighty-Four'

>>13590872
Kek

>>13483702
>Embrace suffering

imagine being this DUMB

>>13453373

>Ayn Rand

>>13407447
SO TRUE

>>13305915
>if you want a few extra years to slut around before getting a husband just keep in shape and take care of your skin

>>13304870
L O L
O
L

>>13252820
What do you like reading?