/lit/ - Literature

>>20206164
I can't believe there are still faggots believing in those jewish fairy tales in 2022

NOOOOO NOT THE DOGGO

NOT THE WHOOFER

NOT THE BORKIN BOOFER!!!

SAVE THE PUPPER

DONT HURT THE GOOD BOI

NOT THE FLUFFER

PLEASE NO NOT THE HECKIN GUD PUPPERINO

>>13609657
bleeps are a spook

The Menace of Marx
The Crusher of Communism
The Killer of Karl

The idea that someone as soft spoken and as thoroughly centrist and status quo as Peterson is controversial at all, really says a lot about how fucked the West is right now.

>I've been reading up on Stirner and his egoist philosophy over the past few weeks
Good for you, what were your thoughts on the spook/property relationship? How far did you get?
>The quirky and seemingly subversive doodle of him (drawn by none other than Marx himself) is similar to the chad meme that /r9k/ loves only they replace chad with egoist and the virgin with spooks.
I dont see the doodle (which as others have pointed out has been attributed) being subversive as much as it is comical and novel which a lot of memes are initially. I see the only similarity being the irreverence is that what you saw or was it something else?
>in this case the egoists invert the idea of principles to try to make their lack of commitment to any some sort of accomplishment.
Which part of his writings gave you that message/idea of his philosophy?
>You hate the fact that you can't find any support for morality in your worldview so instead of continuing to look for answers you take pride in your ignorance.
Are you basing this off of your reading of his book or more your encounter with people online? Morality is not inherently spooked nor does it the book espouse just giving up inquiry. Indeed the bigger point of the book was pointing out the hypocrisy of figures like Feuerbach and progressives.
>many of these self proclaimed egoists
Which egoists are you referring to?
>call themselves nominalists in a half assed attempt to make it seem like they reached their moral views through metaphysics; when in reality they decided their moral views without reason then clung to nominalism as a rationalization
Is it a lack of reason or simply reasoning you think is weak or disagreeable? Is this not a criticism of how humans approach morality more generally than simply a bi-product of Stirner's work it seems like you could replace egoist with a plethora of groups and it would be just as accurate.

Nihlism is nothing yet but a spook

>>11073342
all four of them

>>10968695
I read for pleasure because analyzing great historical works helps me understand myself and the world i live in and i enjoy that.

If you don't read something so nicely crafted and don't sag down and cry in your chair after you're done because you finally understand the significance of the story, you're not reading the right books.

>>10933848
>immoral

Is Stirner a Peep?

>>10921540
my ego is well fed for the day

I see things diferently now thanks to this, also Brothers Karamazov.

>Mom found the ego book in my bookshelf
>thought it looked u n i q u e
>with Stirner’s face looking smug on it
>actually decided to read it while I was gone
>Come back home and she asks me about it
>tell her I’m an egoist
>she thinks I’m a sociopath
>she’s kicking me out of the house
I have 8 hours left at home lit, then I have to leave, what do?

>>9982467
https://track5.mixtape.moe/wtjgrl.pdf

>>9960657
Depends what you mean by that meme known as nihilism. But probably check out this guy, I heard he has some real good full cream milk desu senpai.
>"Stirner planned and financed (with Marie's inheritance) an attempt by some Young Hegelians to own and operate a milk-shop on co-operative principles. This enterprise failed partly because the dairy farmers were suspicious of these well-dressed intellectuals. The milk shop was also so well decorated that most of the potential customers felt too poorly dressed to buy their milk there"

>>9828217
>because I can acknowledge some people are smarter and better educated than me

How spooky.

>>9744693
>primal duty as a man
The greatest men operated above and outside of society, not in it.

>>8427736
>this fuckin guy

"Bourgeoisie" is approximately the same as "Spook", you can only begin to refute it if you drag yourself into their world of reasoning, which is then already a concession of defeat. You simply cannot win. If you try to refute Stirner on his own terms you can't win, even if you speak with measured and cautious language, you will begin to carelessly use words like "unjust", or "virtuous", or "decency", and after uttering these words, with a thunderclap you arrive in bedlam where you can only make out Stirner's cackling though the chaos. The same is true for communism and the "new left". It is impossible to argue without slipping into either "bourgeois logic", or "mansplaining", you simply cannot win. This is why their ideologies are so sinister.

>>8201080
They're spooks.

Now hand over a piece-a of my property my dudes

I honestly don't get why so many authors, philosophers, you name it, are so jubelant about shit like "ego death", or get excited about the fact that subjectivity is an illusion, like some post-structuralists do.

I don't even agree with that, but even if it is so, it is a terrifying prospect and I cannot even perceive it as a release.
Why do people feel such a release from being an "I"? Or even wish to extinguish that idea? If anything being an "I" is a release from the tyranny of the 'greater whole'.

>>7859302
>>7858184
>>7858299
>>7858361
>>7860056
>>7857922

>not using LaTeX
>mfw

>>7824437
>Not 'Well spooked, my property'

Can't meme with the best? Then 404 like the rest

You're right though, unspook yourself OP