/lit/ - Literature

Letter to the Editors

I am met with the feeling of total warmth when I see that my idea was taken up; to say one "owns" &amp is incorrect, although I feel no issue with suggesting I am someone who had the first idea. The second edition of the publication is, in some ways, all about the subtext--which, in some ways, is all &amp is about. Whether there is value in starting a magazine such as this one--started on a board dedicated to literature, "the symbol,"--and using the will of the counterculturalists to use no more than ten words in the entire edition is not a question. "Suicide stops with &amp." In established circles, bad fiction and bad art is lauded because of the image on the cover or the image of the author, or otherwise because the "plot" is used to make some people happy and others sad. Removing both "plot" and the "author" from literature is a bold move, but it does seem that these magazines will become historic as soon as the goobers are able to counterfeit copies and sell them.

The designers must be thanked. The "synthwave," "alt-J" art-style present throughout the series is some of my favourite. It is psychedelia. It's hot. Speaking of "hot," when are we going to get "&amp - Tits Out Edition?" Yes, /lit/ is a "Blue Board," but is blue not representative of death in the world of computers? Are you goyim such intense virgins that you cannot walk up to a woman and ask to photograph her mammaries for an anonymous internet literary magazine? Why can you not write something where there are just tits everywhere and also show a bunch of breasts in the images? Can there not be a connection between the photographs and the story? And if the writers make stories about tits, do you designers not have to just drop the Christian Minecraft thing, man-up and put some tits in an edition for once? And are you writers so sexless that you can't write hot erotica about tits and stuff? I want to masturbate to this series but I haven't so far. Make it make sense, please.

Best,