/lit/ - Literature

>>5538882
>>5538850
That's true. I'm not saying because a scientific concept is currently accepted it should be treated as undeniable truth. A good researcher actively challenges what he's reading and expects errors. So if you have done the research, and have a problem with the studies, with the collected data, or with the conclusions drawn from those things, please speak up and try to bring the flaws to light. But thinking you are in a position to make any judgments about a complex physiological issues because you are capable of critical thinking and have had some personal anecdotes is obviously wrong. Not to say that you shouldn't have an opinion or discuss it, but being this >>5537565 obnoxious and condescending when you clearly have no experience with the field you're dismissing is ridiculous.

>>5538869
Historically scientists have been collectively wrong about many, many things. Blindly accepting what is currently believed without an actual understanding is the same ignorance as dismissing it.