/lit/ - Literature

>>20722853
>he buys books

I am so sick of seeing pro-tranny arguments on /lit/ that I've decided to prove them indubidubly illogical.

1. Monadic substances are those which exist without reference or relation to any other substances; consider the qualitative property of a specific shade of red as existing solely as a potentiality, this is a monadic substance. Like aristotles example of destroying all circles in the universe failing to destroy the possibility of a circle becoming materially instantiated; neither then does a monadic substance such as a potential quality being materially instantiated somewhere in the phenomenal world preclude the simultaneous existence of a corresponding potentiality free of any relations to other objects and substances. Indeed, it necessitates.

2. Dyadic objects are those wherein two subjects comprise the totality of a single object through their necessary relation to one another. Consider the left and right sides of your body, the left and right sides of a spiral, large versus small, fast versus slow, heavy versus light, etc. These are abstract or concrete objects that only exist as a consequence of two distinct subjects coming into relationship with one another. Big can't exist without small, nor can the left side of your body without the right side, etc.

There are very few true concrete dyads extant in the material world that do not depend on a conscious observer relating qualitative and quantative properties between the substances being contemplated and compared.

However, one of those is sex. Male and female are two distinct subjects that come into relation with one another in the moment of their creations so as to necessarily manifest the totality of the concepts we assimilate to "human." Whatever it is that you are, if you're a human, necessitates it be one of two things: male or female.

Male and female are in a dyadic relationship. What this means is, contrary to your illogical tranny beliefs, transsexuals are, in essence, claiming the equivalent that the left half of their body is actually the right half of their body, that big is actually small, that fast is actually slow, that heavy is actually light, that the left half of a spiral is actually its right half, and that they're really women and not men.

A man or woman is a single constituent component in the dyadic object known as the human being. If you give birth, you are a woman. If you engender, you are male.

You're men, not women. Stop dressing that way, stop shitting up /lit/ with your nominalist faggotry.

>>20702918
Hi, nobody. Do you want me to explain it to you in simpler terms, or should I wait until you've finished high-school?

I am so sick of seeing pro-tranny arguments on /lit/ that I've decided to prove them indubidubly illogical.

1. Monadic substances are those which exist without reference or relation to any other substances; consider the qualitative property of a specific shade of red as existing solely as a potentiality, this is a monadic substance. Like aristotles example of destroying all circles in the universe failing to destroy the possibility of a circle becoming materially instantiated; neither then does a monadic substance such as a potential quality being materially instantiated somewhere in the phenomenal world preclude the simultaneous existence of a corresponding potentiality free of any relations to other objects and substances. Indeed, it necessitates.

2. Dyadic objects are those wherein two subjects comprise the totality of a single object through their necessary relation to one another. Consider the left and right sides of your body, the left and right sides of a spiral, large versus small, fast versus slow, heavy versus light, etc. These are abstract or concrete objects that only exist as a consequence of two distinct subjects coming into relationship with one another. Big can't exist without small, nor can the left side of your body without the right side, etc.

There are very few true concrete dyads extant in the material world that do not depend on a conscious observer relating qualitative and quantative properties between the substances being contemplated and compared.

However, one of those is sex. Male and female are two distinct subjects that come into relation with one another in the moment of their creations so as to necessarily manifest the totality of the concepts we assimilate to "human." Whatever it is that you are, if you're a human, necessitates it be one of two things: male or female.

Male and female are in a dyadic relationship. What this means is, contrary to your illogical tranny beliefs, transsexuals are, in essence, claiming the equivalent that the left half of their body is actually the right half of their body, that big is actually small, that fast is actually slow, that heavy is actually light, that the left half of a spiral is actually its right half, and that they're really women and not men.

A man or woman is a single constituent component in the dyadic object known as the human being. If you give birth, you are a woman. If you engender, you are male.

You're men, not women. Stop dressing that way, stop shitting up /lit/ with your nominalist faggotry.

I am so sick of seeing pro-tranny arguments ruining /lit/ that I've decided to prove them indubidubly illogical.

1. Monadic substances are those which exist without reference or relation to any other substances; consider the qualitative property of a specific shade of red as existing solely as a potentiality, this is a monadic substance. Like aristotles example of destroying all circles in the universe failing to destroy the possibility of a circle becoming materially instantiated; neither then does a monadic substance such as a potential quality being materially instantiated somewhere in the phenomenal world preclude the simultaneous existence of a corresponding potentiality free of any relations to other objects and substances. Indeed, it necessitates.

2. Dyadic objects are those wherein two subjects comprise the totality of a single object through their necessary relation to one another. Consider the left and right sides of your body, the left and right sides of a spiral, large versus small, fast versus slow, heavy versus light, etc. These are abstract or concrete objects that only exist as a consequence of two distinct subjects coming into relationship with one another. Big can't exist without small, nor can the left side of your body without the right side, etc.

There are very few true concrete dyads extant in the material world that do not depend on a conscious observer relating qualitative and quantative properties between the substances being contemplated and compared.

However, one of those is sex. Male and female are two distinct subjects that come into relation with one another in the moment of their creations so as to necessarily manifest the totality of the concepts we assimilate to "human." Whatever it is that you are, if you're a human, necessitates it be one of two things: male or female.

Male and female are in a dyadic relationship. What this means is, contrary to your illogical tranny beliefs, transsexuals are, in essence, claiming the equivalent that the left half of their body is actually the right half of their body, that big is actually small, that fast is actually slow, that heavy is actually light, that the left half of a spiral is actually its right half, and that they're really women and not men.

A man or woman is a single constituent component in the dyadic object known as the human being. If you give birth, you are a woman. If you engender, you are male.

You're men, not women. Stop dressing that way, stop shitting up /lit/ with your nominalist faggotry.

I am so sick of seeing pro-tranny arguments that I've decided to prove them indubidubly illogical.

1. Monadic substances are those which exist without reference or relation to any other substances; consider the qualitative property of a specific shade of red as existing solely as a potentiality, this is a monadic substance. Like aristotles example of destroying all circles in the universe failing to destroy the possibility of a circle becoming materially instantiated; neither then does a monadic substance such as a potential quality being materially instantiated somewhere in the phenomenal world preclude the simultaneous existence of a corresponding potentiality free of any relations to other objects and substances. Indeed, it necessitates.

2. Dyadic objects are those wherein two subjects comprise the totality of a single object through their necessary relation to one another. Consider the left and right sides of your body, the left and right sides of a spiral, large versus small, fast versus slow, heavy versus light, etc. These are abstract or concrete objects that only exist as a consequence of two distinct subjects coming into relationship with one another. Big can't exist without small, nor can the left side of your body without the right side, etc.

There are very few true concrete dyads extant in the material world that do not depend on a conscious observer relating qualitative and quantative properties between the substances being contemplated and compared.

However, one of those is sex. Male and female are two distinct subjects that come into relation with one another in the moment of their creations so as to necessarily manifest the totality of the concepts we assimilate to "human." Whatever it is that you are, if you're a human, necessitates it be one of two things: male or female.

Male and female are in a dyadic relationship. What this means is, contrary to your illogical tranny beliefs, transsexuals are, in essence, claiming the equivalent that the left half of their body is actually the right half of their body, that big is actually small, that fast is actually slow, that heavy is actually light, that the left half of a spiral is actually its right half, and that they're really women and not men.

A man or woman is a single constituent component in the dyadic object known as the human being. If you give birth, you are a woman. If you engender, you are male.

You're men, not women. Stop dressing that way, stop shitting up /lit/ with your nominalist faggotry.

I am so sick of seeing pro-tranny arguments that I've decided to prove them indubidubly illogical.

1. Monadic substances are those which exist without reference or relation to any other substances; consider the qualitative property of a specific shade of red as existing solely as a potentiality, this is a monadic substance. Like aristotles example of destroying all circles in the universe failing to destroy the possibility of a circle becoming materially instantiated; neither then does a monadic substance such as a potential quality being materially instantiated somewhere in the phenomenal world preclude the simultaneous existence of a corresponding potentiality free of any relations to other objects and substances. Indeed, it necessitates.

2. Dyadic objects are those wherein two subjects comprise the totality of a single object through their necessary relation to one another. Consider the left and right sides of your body, the left and right sides of a spiral, large versus small, fast versus slow, heavy versus light, etc. These are abstract or concrete objects that only exist as a consequence of two distinct subjects coming into relationship with one another. Big can't exist without small, nor can the left side of your body without the right side, etc.

There are very few true concrete dyads extant in the material world that do not depend on a conscious observer relating qualitative and quantative properties between the substances being contemplated and compared.

However, one of those is sex. Male and female are two distinct subjects that come into relation with one another in the moment of their creations so as to necessarily manifest the totality of the concepts we assimilate to "human." Whatever it is that you are, if you're a human, necessitates it be one of two things: male or female.

Male and female are in a dyadic relationship. What this means is, contrary to your illogical tranny beliefs, transsexuals are, in essence, claiming the equivalent that the left half of their body is actually the right half of their body, that big is actually small, that fast is actually slow, that heavy is actually light, that the left half of a spiral is actually its right half, and that they're really women and not men.

You're men.

I decide whether or not a philosophy prof. Is shit or not based entirely on their explanation of aristotles categories m, and this guy is an aggressive 3/10.